 |
Prominent Lebanese | Midddle East Historic Documents | Brirish White Paper of 1939
Middle East Historic Documents
|
British White Paper of 1939
In the statement on Palestine, issued on 9 November, 1938,
His Majesty's Government announced their intention to invite representatives of the Arabs
of Palestine, of certain neighboring countries and of the Jewish Agency to confer with
them in London regarding future policy. It was their sincere hope that, as a result of
full, free and frank discussions, some understanding might be reached. Conferences
recently took place with Arab and Jewish delegations, lasting for a period of several
weeks, and served the purpose of a complete exchange of views between British Ministers
and the Arab and Jewish representatives. In the light of the discussions as well as of the
situation in Palestine and of the Reports of the Royal Commission and the Partition
Commission, certain proposals were formulated by His Majesty's Government and were laid
before the Arab and Jewish Delegations as the basis of an agreed settlement. Neither the
Arab nor the Jewish delegation felt able to accept these proposals, and the conferences
therefore did not result in an agreement. Accordingly His Majesty's Government are free to
formulate their own policy, and after careful consideration they have decided to adhere
generally to the proposals which were finally submitted to and discussed with the Arab and
Jewish delegations.
The Mandate for Palestine, the terms of which were
confirmed by the Council of the League of Nations in 1922, has governed the policy of
successive British Governments for nearly 20 years. It embodies the Balfour Declaration
and imposes on the Mandatory four main obligations. These obligations are set out in
Article 2, 6 and 13 of the Mandate. There is no dispute regarding the interpretation of
one of these obligations, that touching the protection of and access to the Holy Places
and religious building or sites. The other three main obligations are generally as
follows:
To place the country under such political, administrative
and economic conditions as will secure the establishment in Palestine of a national home
for the Jewish People. To facilitate Jewish immigration under suitable conditions, and to
encourage, in cooperation with the Jewish Agency, close settlement by Jews on the Land.
To safeguard the civil and religious rights of all
inhabitants of Palestine irrespective of race and religion, and, whilst facilitating
Jewish immigration and settlement, to ensure that the rights and position of other
sections of the population are not prejudiced.
To place the country under such political, administrative
and economic conditions as will secure the development of self governing institutions.
The Royal Commission and previous commissions of Enquiry
have drawn attention to the ambiguity of certain expressions in the Mandate, such as the
expression `a national home for the Jewish people', and they have found in this ambiguity
and the resulting uncertainty as to the objectives of policy a fundamental cause of unrest
and hostility between Arabs and Jews. His Majesty's Government are convinced that in the
interests of the peace and well being of the whole people of Palestine a clear definition
of policy and objectives is essential. The proposal of partition recommended by the Royal
Commission would have afforded such clarity, but the establishment of self supporting
independent Arab and Jewish States within Palestine has been found to be impracticable. It
has therefore been necessary for His Majesty's Government to devise an alternative policy
which will, consistent with their obligations to Arabs and Jews, meet the needs of the
situation in Palestine. Their views and proposals are set forth below under three heads,
Section I, "The Constitution", Section II. Immigration and Section III. Land.
Section I. "The Constitution"
It has been urged that the expression "a national home
for the Jewish people" offered a prospect that Palestine might in due course become a
Jewish State or Commonwealth. His Majesty's Government do not wish to contest the view,
which was expressed by the Royal Commission, that the Zionist leaders at the time of the
issue of the Balfour Declaration recognised that an ultimate Jewish State was not
precluded by the terms of the Declaration. But, with the Royal Commission, His Majesty's
Government believe that the framers of the Mandate in which the Balfour Declaration was
embodied could not have intended that Palestine should be converted into a Jewish State
against the will of the Arab population of the country. That Palestine was not to be
converted into a Jewish State might be held to be implied in the passage from the Command
Paper of 1922 which reads as follows
"Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect
that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used
such as that `Palestine is to become as Jewish as England is English.' His Majesty's
Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor
have they at any time contemplated .... the disappearance or the subordination of the
Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact
that the terms of the (Balfour) Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine
as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be
founded IN PALESTINE."
But this statement has not removed doubts, and His
Majesty's Government therefore now declare unequivocally that it is not part of their
policy that Palestine should become a Jewish State. They would indeed regard it as
contrary to their obligations to the Arabs under the Mandate, as well as to the assurances
which have been given to the Arab people in the past, that the Arab population of
Palestine should be made the subjects of a Jewish State against their will.
The nature of the Jewish National Home in Palestine was
further described in the Command Paper of 1922 as follows
"During the last two or three generations the Jews
have recreated in Palestine a community now numbering 80,000, of whom about one fourth are
farmers or workers upon the land. This community has its own political organs; an elected
assembly for the direction of its domestic concerns; elected councils in the towns; and an
organisation for the control of its schools. It has its elected Chief Rabbinate and
Rabbinical Council for the direction of its religious affairs. Its business is conducted
in Hebrew as a vernacular language, and a Hebrew press serves its needs. It has its
distinctive intellectual life and displays considerable economic activity. This community,
then, with its town and country population, its political, religious and social
organisations, its own language, its own customs, its own life, has in fact `national'
characteristics. When it is asked what is meant by the development of the Jewish National
Home in Palestine, it may be answered that it is not the imposition of a Jewish
nationality upon the inhabitants of Palestine as a whole, but the further development of
the existing Jewish community, with the assistance of Jews in other parts of the world, in
order that it may become a centre in which the Jewish people as a whole may take, on
grounds of religion and race, an interest and pride. But in order that this community
should have the best prospect of free development and provide a full opportunity for the
Jewish people to display its capacities, it is essential that it should know that it is in
Palestine as of right and not on sufferance. That is the reason why it is necessary that
the existence of a Jewish National Home in Palestine should be internationally guaranteed,
and that it should be formally recognised to rest upon ancient historic connection."
His Majesty's Government adhere to this intepretation of
the (Balfour) Declaration of 1917 and regard it as an authoritative and comprehensive
description of the character of the Jewish National Home in Palestine. It envisaged the
further development of the existing Jewish community with the assistance of Jews in other
parts of the world. Evidence that His Majesty's Government have been carrying out their
obligation in this respect is to be found in the facts that, since the statement of 1922
was published, more than 300,000 Jews have immigrated to Palestine, and that the
population of the National Home has risen to some 450,000, or approaching a third of the
entire population of the country. Nor has the Jewish community failed to take full
advantage of the opportunities given to it. The growth of the Jewish National Home and its
acheivements in many fields are a remarkable constructive effort which must command the
admiration of the world and must be, in particular, a source of pride to the Jewish
people.
In the recent discussions the Arab delegations have
repeated the contention that Palestine was included within the area in which Sir Henry
McMahon, on behalf of the British Government, in October, 1915, undertook to recognise and
support Arab independence. The validity of this claim, based on the terms of the
correspondence which passed between Sir Henry McMahon and the Sharif of Mecca, was
thoroughly and carefully investigated by the British and Arab representatives during the
recent conferences in London. Their report, which has been published, states that both the
Arab and the British representatives endeavoured to understand the point of view of the
other party but that they were unable to reach agreement upon an interpretation of the
correspondence. There is no need to summarize here the arguments presented by each side.
His Majesty's Government regret the misunderstandings which have arisen as regards some of
the phrases used. For their part they can only adhere, for the reasons given by their
representatives in the Report, to the view that the whole of Palestine west of Jordan was
excluded from Sir Henry McMahon's pledge, and they therefore cannot agree that the McMahon
correspondence forms a just basis for the claim that Palestine should be converted into an
Arab State.
His Majesty's Government are charged as the Mandatory
authority "to secure the development of self governing institutions" in
Palestine. Apart from this specific obligation, they would regard it as contrary to the
whole spirit of the Mandate system that the population of Palestine should remain forever
under Mandatory tutelage. It is proper that the people of the country should as early as
possible enjoy the rights of self-government which are exercised by the people of
neighbouring countries. His Majesty's Government are unable at present to foresee the
exact constitutional forms which government in Palestine will eventually take, but their
objective is self government, and they desire to see established ultimately an independent
Palestine State. It should be a State in which the two peoples in Palestine, Arabs and
Jews, share authority in government in such a way that the essential interests of each are
shared.
The establishment of an independent State and the complete
relinquishmnet of Mandatory control in Palestine would require such relations between the
Arabs and the Jews as would make good government possible. Moreover, the growth of self
governing institutions in Palestine, as in other countries, must be an evolutionary
process. A transitional period will be required before independence is achieved,
throughout which ultimate responsibility for the Government of the country will be
retained by His Majesty's Government as the Mandatory authority, while the people of the
country are taking an increasing share in the Government, and understanding and
cooperation amongst them are growing. It will be the constant endeavour of His Majesty's
Government to promote good relations between the Arabs and the Jews.
In the light of these considerations His Majesty's
Government make the following declaration of their intentions regarding the future
government of Palestine:
The objective of His Majesty's Government is the
establishment within 10 years of an independent Palestine State in such treaty relations
with the United Kingdom as will provide satisfactorily for the commercial and strategic
requirements of both countries in the future. The proposal for the establishment of the
independent State would involve consultation with the Council of the League of Nations
with a view to the termination of the Mandate.
The independent State should be one in which Arabs and Jews
share government in such a way as to ensure that the essential interests of each community
are safeguarded.
The establishment of the independent State will be preceded
by a transitional period throughout which His Majesty's Government will retain
responsibility for the country. During the transitional period the people of Palestine
will be given an increasing part in the government of their country. Both sections of the
population will have an opportunity to participate in the machinery of government, and the
process will be carried on whether or not they both avail themselves of it.
As soon as peace and order have been sufficiently restored
in Palestine steps will be taken to carry out this policy of giving the people of
Palestine an increasing part in the government of their country, the objective being to
place Palestinians in charge of all the Departments of Government, with the assistance of
British advisers and subject to the control of the High Commissioner. Arab and Jewish
representatives will be invited to serve as heads of Departments approximately in
proportion to their respective populations. The number of Palestinians in charge of
Departments will be increased as circumstances permit until all heads of Departments are
Palestinians, exercising the administrative and advisory functions which are presently
performed by British officials. When that stage is reached consideration will be given to
the question of converting the Executive Council into a Council of Ministers with a
consequential change in the status and functions of the Palestinian heads of Departments.
His Majesty's Government make no proposals at this stage
regarding the establishment of an elective legislature. Nevertheless they would regard
this as an appropriate constitutional development, and, should public opinion in Palestine
hereafter show itself in favour of such a development, they will be prepared, provided
that local conditions permit, to establish the necessary machinery.
At the end of five years from the restoration of peace and
order, an appropriate body representative of the people of Palestine and of His Majesty's
Government will be set up to review the working of the constitutional arrangements during
the transitional period and to consider and make recommendations regarding the
constitution of the independent Palestine State.
His Majesty's Government will require to be satisfied that
in the treaty contemplated by sub-paragraph (6) adequate provision has been made for:
the security of, and freedom of access to the Holy Places,
and protection of the interests and property of the various religious bodies.
the protection of the different communities in Palestine in
accordance with the obligations of His Majesty's Government to both Arabs and Jews and for
the special position in Palestine of the Jewish NationalHome.
such requirements to meet the strategic situation as may be
regarded as necessary by His Majesty's Government in the light of the circumstances then
existing. His Majesty's Government will also require to be satisfied that the interests of
certain foreign countries in Palestine, for the preservation of which they are at present
responsible, are adequately safeguarded.
His Majesty's Government will do everything in their power
to create conditions which will enable the independent Palestine State to come into being
within 10 years. If, at the end of 10 years, it appears to His Majesty's Government that,
contrary to their hope, circumstances require the postponement of the establishment of the
independent State, they will consult with representatives of the people of Palestine, the
Council of the League of Nations and the neighbouring Arab States before deciding on such
a postponement. If His Majesty's Government come to the conclusion that postponement is
unavoidable, they will invite the co-operation of these parties in framing plans for the
future with a view to achieving the desired objective at the earliest possible date.
During the transitional period steps will be taken to
increase the powers and responsibilities of municipal corporations and local councils.
Section II. Immigration
Under Article 6 of the Mandate, the Administration of
Palestine, "while ensuring that the rights and position of other sections of the
population are not prejudiced," is required to "facilitate Jewish immigration
under suitable conditions." Beyond this, the extent to which Jewish immigration into
Palestine is to be permitted is nowhere defined in the Mandate. But in the Command Paper
of 1922 it was laid down that for the fulfilment of the policy of establishing a Jewish
National Home:
"it is necessary that the Jewish commun ity in
Palestine should be able to increase its numbers by immigration. This immigration cannot
be so great in volume as to exceed whatever may be the economic capacity of the country at
the time to absorb new arrivals. It is essential to ensure that the immigrants should not
be a burden upon the people of Palestine as a whole, and that they should not deprive any
section of the present population of their employment."
In practice, from that date onwards until recent times, the
economic absorptive capacity of the country has been treated as the sole limiting factor,
and in the letter which Mr. Ramsay MacDonald, as Prime Minister, sent to Dr. Weizmann in
February 1931 it was laid down as a matter of policy that economic absorptive capacity was
the sole criterion. This interpretation has been supported by resolutions of the Permanent
Mandates Commissioner. But His Majesty's Government do not read either the Statement of
Policy of 1922 or the letter of 1931 as implying that the Mandate requires them, for all
time and in all circumstances, to facilitate the immigration of Jews into Palestine
subject only to consideration of the country's economic absorptive capacity. Nor do they
find anything in the Mandate or in subsequent Statements of Policy to support the view
that the establishment of a Jewish National Home in Palestine cannot be effected unless
immigration is allowed to continue indefinitely. If immigration has an adverse effect on
the economic position in the country, it should clearly be restricted; and equally, if it
has a seriously damaging effect on the political position in the country, that is a factor
that should not be ignored. Although it is not difficult to contend that the large number
of Jewish immigrants who have been admitted so far have been absrobed economically, the
fear of the Arabs that this influx will continue indefinitely until the Jewish population
is in a position to dominate them has produced consequences which are extremely grave for
Jews and Arabs alike and for the peace and prosperity of Palestine. The lamentable
disturbances of the past three years are only the latest and most sustained manifestation
of this intense Arab apprehension. The methods employed by Arab terrorists against fellow
Arabs and Jews alike must receive unqualified condemnation. But it cannot be denied that
fear of indefinite Jewish immigration is widespread amongst the Arab population and that
this fear has made possible disturbances which have given a serious setback to economic
progress, depleted the Palestine exchequer, rendered life and property insecure, and
produced a bitterness between the Arab and Jewish populations which is deplorable between
citizens of the same country. If in these circumstances immigration is continued up to the
economic absorptive capacity of the country, regardless of all other considerations, a
fatal enmity between the two peoples will be perpetuated, and the situation in Palestine
may become a permanent source of friction amongst all peoples in the Near and Middle East.
His Majesty's Government cannot take the view that either their obligations under the
Mandate, or considerations of common sense and justice, require that they should ignore
these circumstances in framing immigration policy.
In the view of the Royal Commission the association of the
policy of the Balfour Declaration with the Mandate system implied the belief that Arab
hostility to the former would sooner or later be overcome. It has been the hope of British
Governments ever since the Balfour Declaration was issued that in time the Arab
population, recognizing the advantages to be derived from Jewish settlement and
development in Palestine, would become reconciled to the further growth of the Jewish
National Home. This hope has not been fulfilled. The alternatives before His Majesty's
Government are either (i) to seek to expand the Jewish National Home indefinitely by
immigration, against the strongly expressed will of the Arab people of the country; or
(ii) to permit further expansion of the Jewish National Home by immigration only if the
Arabs are prepared to acquiesce in it. The former policy means rule by force. Apart from
other considerations, such a policy seems to His Majesty's Government to be contrary to
the whole spirit of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, as well as to
their specific obligations to the Arabs in the Palestine Mandate. Moreover, the relations
between the Arabs and the Jews in Palestine must be based sooner or later on mutual
tolerance and goodwill; the peace, security and progress of the Jewish National Home
itself requires this. Therefore His Majesty's Government, after earnest consideration, and
taking into account the extent to which the growth of the Jewish National Home has been
facilitated over the last twenty years, have decided that the time has come to adopt in
principle the second of the alternatives referred to above.
It has been urged that all further Jewish immigration into
Palestine should be stopped forthwith. His Majesty's Government cannot accept such a
proposal. It would damage the whole of the financial and economic system of Palestine and
thus effect adversely the interests of Arabs and Jews alike. Moreover, in the view of His
Majesty's Government, abruptly to stop further immigration would be unjust to the Jewish
National Home. But, above all, His Majesty's Government are conscious of the present
unhappy plight of large numbers of Jews who seek refuge from certain European countries,
and they believe that Palestine can and should make a further contribution to the solution
of this pressing world problem. In all these circumstances, they believe that they will be
acting consistently with their Mandatory obligations to both Arabs and Jews, and in the
manner best calculated to serve the interests of the whole people of Palestine, by
adopting the following proposals regarding immigration:
Jewish immigration during the next five years will be at a
rate which, if economic absorptive capacity permits, will bring the Jewish population up
to approximately one third of the total population of the country. Taking into account the
expected natural increase of the Arab and Jewish populations, and the number of illegal
Jewish immigrants now in the country, this would allow of the admission, as from the
beginning of April this year, of some 75,000 immigrants over the next five years. These
immigrants would, subject to the criterion of economic absorptive capacity, be admitted as
follows:
For each of the next five years a quota of 10,000 Jewish
immigrants will be allowed on the understanding that a shortage one year may be added to
the quotas for subsequent years, within the five year period, if economic absorptive
capacity permits.
In addition, as a contribution towards the solution of the
Jewish refugee problem, 25,000 refugees will be admitted as soon as the High Commissioner
is satisfied that adequate provision for their maintenance is ensured, special
consideration being given to refugee children anddependents.
The existing machinery for ascertaining economic absorptive
capacity will be retained, and the High Commissioner will have the ultimate responsibility
for deciding the limits of economic capacity. Before each periodic decision is taken,
Jewish and Arab representatives will be consulted.
After the period of five years, no further Jewish
immigration will be permitted unless the Arabs of Palestine are prepared to acquiesce in
it.
His Majesty's Government are determined to check illegal
immigration, and further preventive measures are being adopted. The numbers of any Jewish
illegal immigrants who, despite these measures, may succeed in coming into the country and
cannot be deported will be deducted from the yearly quotas.
His Majesty's Government are satisfied that, when the
immigration over five years which is now contemplated has taken place, they will not be
justified in facilitating, nor will they be under any obligation to facilitate, the
further development of the Jewish National Home by immigration regardless of the wishes of
the Arab population. Section III. Land
The Administration of Palestine is required, under Article
6 of the Mandate, "while ensuring that the rights and position of other sections of
the population are not prejudiced," to encourage "close settlement by Jews on
the land," and no restriction has been imposed hitherto on the transfer of land from
Arabs to Jews. The Reports of several expert Commissions have indictaed that, owing to the
natural growth of the Arab population and the steady sale in recent years of Arab land to
Jews, there is now in certain areas no room for further transfers of Arab land, whilst in
some other areas such transfers of land must be restricted if Arab cultivators are to
maintain their existing standard of life and a considerable landless Arab population is
not soon to be created. In these circumstances, the High Commissioner will be given
general powers to prohibit and regulate transfers of land. These powers will date from the
publication of this statement of policy and the High Commissioner will retain them
throughout the transitional period.
The policy of the Government will be directed towards the
development of the land and the improvement, where possible, of methods of cultivation. In
the light of such development it will be open to the High Commissioner, should he be
satisfied that the "rights and position" of the Arab population will be duly
preserved, to review and modify any orders passed relating to the prohibition or
restriction of the transfer of land.
In framing these proposals His Majesty's Government have
sincerely endeavoured to act in strict accordance with their obligations under the Mandate
to both the Arabs and the Jews. The vagueness of the phrases employed in some instances to
describe these obligations has led to controversy and has made the task of interpretation
difficult. His Majesty's Government cannot hope to satisfy the partisans of one party or
the other in such controversy as the Mandate has aroused. Their purpose is to be just as
between the two people in Palestine whose destinies in that country have been affected by
the great events of recent years, and who, since they live side by side, must learn to
practice mutual tolerance, goodwill and co operation. In looking to the future, His
Majesty's Government are not blind to the fact that some events of the past make the task
of creating these relations difficult; but they are encouraged by the knowledge that as
many times and in many places in Palestine during recent years the Arab and Jewish
inhabitants have lived in friendship together. Each community has much to contribute to
the welfare of their common land, and each must earnestly desire peace in which to assist
in increasing the well being of the whole people of the country. The responsibility which
falls on them, no less than upon His Majesty's Government, to co operate together to
ensure peace is all the more solemn because their country is revered by many millions of
Moslems, Jews and Christians throughout the world who pray for peace in Palestine and for
the happiness of her people.
|
 |