|
||
|
||
| Maronite
Patriarch rejects presence of two armies in Lebanon Calls for transferring Hezbollahs weapons to army BEIRUT - Maronite Patriarch Nasrallah Butros Sfeir stressed his rejection on Tuesday of the presence of two armies in the country, a reference to Hezbollah, while urging the transfer of the partys weapons to the Lebanese Army. The patriarchs call came ahead of scheduled talks during national dialogue sessions, under the sponsorship of President Michel Sleiman, aimed at reaching an agreement over a defense strategy that defines the resistances role, its relation to the Lebanese Army and the states authority over war-and-peace decisions. Following the formation of the new national-unity Cabinet, a heated debate arose between March 14 Christian parties and opposition groups over a clause in the ministerial statement on the resistances right to liberate occupied territories independently from the state. The Lebanese Forces and the Phalange Party along with several independent MPs said article six in the statement conflicted with international resolutions and the states monopoly of authority by granting the resistance an independent status. Article six of the statement highlights Lebanons right to liberate its occupied territories by means of its army, resistance and people. The conventional army is alone to defend the nation and the resistance along with its arms should join the Lebanese Army when everyone resists the enemy, Sfeir said. Sfeirs statement preceded talks with Sleiman at Baabda Palace during which they tackled the issue of Hezbollahs weapons, upcoming discussions over a national defense strategy, the abolishing of political sectarianism and the Palestinian refugees right of return. Sfeir, heading the Maronite Bishops Council, had earlier held talks with Free Patriotic Movement leader MP Michel Aoun after a break in contact between both men in the previous months. The meeting, which was described as positive, did not, however, lead to an agreement over the issue of Hezbollahs weapons, though the bishops called for the restriction of arms to the Lebanese Army. The issue of Hezbollahs weapons and Aouns alliance with the party has been the source of tensions between the patriarchy and the FPM leader in recent months. On Tuesday, Sfeir argued that a party which works for its personal interests at the expense of nations would be working toward the destruction of the nation. Is it possible to have a conventional army and another one not compliant with [the states] legitimacy directing its arms one day toward the enemy and another day toward domestic parties? Sfeir asked, referring to Hezbollahs role in the May 7, 2008, clashes. Bloody clashes broke out on May 7 between pro-opposition and government supporters in Beirut following a Cabinet decision to dismantle Hezbollahs telecommunication network. Tackling Parliament Speaker Nabih Berris call to abolish political sectarianism, Sfeir reiterated his earlier statement, stressing the need to abolish political sectarianism from souls before records. The implementation of the Taif Accord necessitates the discussions of its articles step by step, Sfeir added. Sfeir also emphasized that democracy dictated that a majority rules and a minority opposed but today they joined in a national unity Cabinet; nevertheless, there are still obstacles which have not been removed yet. Christian leaders rejected Berris call to form a national committee tasked with abolishing political sectarianism in the current circumstances, saying it would instigate a schism among the Lebanese while others tied it to the full implementation of the Taif Accord. -Daily Star |