|
||
|
||
| Russia:
Dipping into the Revenue Candy Jar Summary The Russian government has embarked on a spending spree after years of frugality under the leadership of Vladimir Putin. In the coming years, Moscow faces the risk of overextension the bane of the Soviet Union unless the Kremlin keeps its ambitions manageable. Analysis New spending, however, has begun to deflate the cushiony budget surplus Russia has maintained since 2000. The Russian governments budgetary expenditures are set to increase by 38 percent, from $261 billion in 2008 to $360 billion in 2009, whittling away at 2007s nearly $50 billion dollar budget surplus and catching up to total revenues by 2010. According to the governments latest budget, major areas of expenditure include national defense, nationwide issues, law enforcement, the economy, infrastructure development, interbudget transfers and, paradoxically, off-budget expenses. Many of these costs are growing, some by more than 20 percent year-on-year. Add in the recent war in Georgia (estimated as costing $16.1 billion) and the implications the war brings for increased Russian spending in the former Soviet Union to consolidate power in its near abroad, then the leap in Russias 2009 budget makes sense as do the less drastic but still significant projected leaps of 14 percent in 2010 and 10 percent in 2011. Yet the new spending spree entails that Moscow must once more face the risk of overextension, which, over the course of decades, proved to be the Soviet Unions tragic flaw. In the aftermath of the Arab oil embargo in the 1970s, the Soviets were rudely awakened by the power that Saudi Arabia drew from its oil reserves. Starting from scratch, the Soviets ramped up development projects and production to begin reaping the full harvest of their own petroleum deposits. At the same time, the Soviet Union used the massive revenues to stretch its tentacles abroad, subsidizing its allies from the Middle East to the Caribbean and propping up otherwise poorer regimes such as Cuba, Nicaragua, Mali and Mozambique. This game became too expensive for the Soviets to maintain when oil prices suddenly dropped in the 1980s. All the pipelines,railroads and production facilities that Moscow had not finished constructing in Siberia, the Caucasus and Central Asia were suddenly abandoned, along with massive arms caches and military hardware. The lavish subsidies it lost on satellite states became a bitter pill for the Kremlin to swallow. Modern Russia depends greatly on oil and natural gas exports to fill the governments coffers as did the Soviet Union. Today, the energy sector provides fully one half of government revenues. And since Putin rose to power in 2000, the government has kept up a healthy budgetary surplus by predicting oil prices conservatively and budgeting accordingly. In 2007, however, this began to change, as Putin felt that Russia had reached the point where it could afford to begin spending on improvements at home and reclaiming its international stature. Not only were the finances right, but he was granted a window of opportunity by the United States absorption in its Middle Eastern campaigns. Russia has taken further advantage of this window in 2008 with its decisive actions in the Caucasus, and 2009 promises the steepest increase in expenditures yet. But Russias increasing assertiveness depends in great part on the mountain of reserves it has built up from high commodity and especially energy prices. If global energy prices precipitously drop, half of Russias budgeted revenues could suddenly evaporate. Therefore, Moscow can only hope that its prediction for the next three years comes true: up from only $34 per barrel in 2006 and $55 in 2007, Russias new budget predicts that oil will cost $95 per barrel in 2009, descending gently to $88 per barrel in 2011. With such high predictions for the cost of oil, the Kremlin seems to have forgotten the volatility of oil prices and the vulnerability inherent in spending too much to attempt big things quickly. Fortunately for Russia, however, the Kremlins ambitions are far more manageable this time around, making a Soviet-style collapse unlikely even if energy prices do plummet. Unlike the Soviet Union, Putins Russia has not extended itself into the far reaches of the world to wage proxy wars against the United States. Instead, it has stuck close to home, reserving major energy and infrastructure projects for former Soviet Union countries. These countries cannot escape their geographical proximity to Russia, or their susceptibility to its political will; hence, expensive Russian investments into their societies and economies will not simply vanish if Russia is forced to withdraw or cut back on spending. Moreover, even if energy prices do fall, Russias massive rainy-day fund alone will be able to buoy the country for at least two years. So far, there is no hint that Russia hopes to restart the Soviet strategy of sending massive subsidies to proxies on different continents. It has opened up lines of communication and offered tokens to Venezuela and Cuba recently. And Nicaragua has made a bid for Russian cooperation. Russia will also continue to deal with Middle Eastern allies such as Iran. But none of these activities show any sign of growing into full-scale regime-propping. As long as Putin and his followers avoid the urge to overextend themselves, they will be able to weather a sudden drop in prices. And if prices climb according to their predictions, the revenue might allow them to achieve big things within their periphery. This article is published at Lebanonwire by agreement with www.stratfor.com, the world's leading private intelligence provider. For any questions or comments on this article please write to analysis@stratfor.com |
||
Copyright © 2005 Strategic Forecasting Inc. All rights reserved. |
||
Copyright © 1999-2008 Lenanonwire®.com. All rights reserved. |
||